First of all, let’s quickly review Collins’s concept. Level 5 refers to the highest level in a hierarchy of executive capabilities. Leaders at the other four levels may be successful, but are unable to elevate companies from mediocrity to sustained excellence. A Level 5 Leader builds “enduring greatness.” This type of leader represents remarkable personal duality. Collins’s formula is simple: Level 5 = Humility + Will. A Level 5 leader’s ambition, first and foremost, is “for the company (or for the project) and concern for its success, rather than for one’s own riches and personal renown.” Talking about a “Level 5 leader,” Collins usually means a CEO or a company leader, but I believe that his outstanding concept also can be successfully applied to project leaders. Read on and you’ll see why. According to Collins, a Level 5 leader utilizes several simple, but powerful, strategies. Here I’d like to highlight only three of them:
- Confront the brutal facts: A Level 5 leader must create a culture wherein people have a tremendous opportunity to be heard.
- Culture of discipline: Level 5 leaders rely on:
Disciplined thought – you don’t need bureaucracy,
Disciplined action – you don’t need excessive controls.
- Technology Accelerators: Level 5 leaders avoid technology fads and bandwagons, yet they often become pioneers in using carefully selected technologies that help them to gather momentum.
Opportunity to be heard
The collaborative environment provided and maintained by Project Management 2.0 tools lets everyone on the team share knowledge and relevant information. Thus everyone on the team can be heard and can introduce ideas about the development of the project.
Culture of discipline
In Project Management 2.0, the collaborative environment is a perfect incubator for the culture of discipline. Project Management 2.0 relies on emergent structures, not on a hierarchy. In Project Management 2.0, people can update their parts of the project plans by themselves. Thus, superfluous reports and documentation are eliminated. That means less bureaucracy. Project Management 2.0 supports free-form collaboration; at the same time, it lets managers keep control of what is happening on the project and who is busy with what. Still, the control is not excessive, and it does not damage the collective work.
Gathering momentum
Project Management 2.0 can be executed only with the help of special tools -- Web-based technologies that provide rapid and agile collaboration, information-sharing, emergence and integration capabilities for the team. These technologies include linking, tagging, building project views and tasks hierarchies. Project Management 2.0 tools are empowered by collective intelligence and emergent structures. Thanks to these two powerful practices, Project Management 2.0 tools can make companies more agile, projects more controllable and people more productive.
As a conclusion, I’d like to say that Level 5 leadership and Project Management 2.0 are two great concepts that can be followed simultaneously. Project Management 2.0 amplifies with Level 5 in many ways, some of which I tried to explore in this post. In both concepts, the team and its collective effort and efficiency are the focus, not the leader. A Level 5 leader, as well as Project 2.0 leader, aims at success and creates superb results, while inspiring and motivating his/her team. A Project 2.0 leader’s role, just like a Level 5 leader’s role, is to empower his/her people and guide them toward achieving a common goal, be it successful project completion or greatness of the whole company.
In a current project as part of informal charter we had to establish, right a the outset, our "flows of communication." I personally love chaotic freeflow of information at the outset, but as the project progresses that brainstorming turns into turning out the building blocks. Sometimes you have to revert back to the chaotic discussion... or it's forced upon you by a problem.
The flows of communication for us I believe are something like this: (1) action items, (2) discussion items - further categorized, (3) development of the "canon", i.e. posting of key documents, (4) drafting outline that we would add to, and (5) unmanaged offline communications.
Web 2.0 should facilitate the creation of a very alive primordial soup out of which weave these various flows while allowing each type of flow to still be monitored.
7 attributes of leadership for Project Managers
In English: http://dantotsupm.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/7-attributes-of-leadership-for-the-project-manager/
en Français: http://dantotsupm.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/7-attributs-du-leadership-pour-le-chef-de-projet/
: 7 attributes of leadership for Project Managers
Thanks for your comment and interesting post.
Cheers,
Andrew